Image comparison

GPT Image 2 vs. 2.5

12 challenging UI design prompts put GPT Image 2, 2.5 Flare, and 2.5 Sunburst through their paces. Compare the same prompts across quality levels, alongside cost and generation time.

Film Portfolio Collision

For 2.5, Medium already establishes the look. Max costs over four times as much while keeping the same portrait-led, diagonal art direction.

Prompt and reference images

Treat Image 1 as a functional specification, not a design reference: preserve only its interaction archetype, information needs, and useful actions. Create a new original, aesthetically exceptional, polished, and usable interface for a documentary film catalogue for small communities sharing limited resources focused on publishing and managing a creative portfolio. Recompose it freely into a distinctly different product, content domain, hierarchy, and visual identity. Find a coherent, aesthetically resolved intersection between the distinct visual-system logics in Images 2 and 3. Transfer their reasoning rather than combining their literal motifs, content, or layouts. Create fresh copy and entirely new visual assets; do not reuse pixels, logos, brands, proper nouns, readable phrases, illustrations, photos, icons, or a recognizable arrangement from any reference. Use the full native-ratio canvas without padding, cropping, stretching, letterboxing, a device mockup, or a surrounding frame. Return only the finished interface design.

  1. 01 · functional-seed
  2. 02 · real-composition-donor
  3. 03 · real-contrast-donor
ModelLOWMEDIUMHIGHXHIGHMAX
GPT Image 2

USD$0.0381TIME23.7s

USD$0.0739TIME50.7s

USD$0.1922TIME109.8s

Not supportedGPT Image 2XHIGH quality unavailable
Not supportedGPT Image 2MAX quality unavailable
GPT Image 2.5 Flare

USD$0.0382TIME20.1s

USD$0.0437TIME18.7s

USD$0.0740TIME23.6s

USD$0.1048TIME28.9s

USD$0.1923TIME43.9s

GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst

USD$0.0382TIME18.3s

USD$0.0437TIME20.9s

USD$0.0740TIME37.8s

USD$0.1048TIME44.0s

USD$0.1923TIME80.6s

Put GPT Image 2.5 to work with 12ui.